Charles Dickens presentation Essay Example for Free

Charles Dickens presentation Essay Do you feel that Charles Dickens presentation of Joe Gargery makes him seem on balance a foolish person or someone worthy of our respect? In Great Expectations, Joe Gargery comes into the novel many times. Sometimes he is portrayed as a very foolish person but other times he actually is quite clever and worthy of our respect. At the beginning of the novel, he seems foolish in the sense that he is a very simple man and does nothing to hide it. When Pip is reading him a letter, Joe remarks Why, heres a J, said Joe, and a O equal to anythink! Heres a J and a O, Pip, and a J-O, Joe. Pip carries on by saying I had never heard Joe read aloud to any great extent than this monosyllable, and I had observed at church last Sunday when I accidentally held our Prayer-Book upside down, that it seemed to suit his convenience quite as well as if it had been all right. There are many more examples of his foolishness but there is one important point that must be included to understand why Joe puts up with Mrs Joes nagging the whole time. He tells Pip about how his father beat his mother and him constantly: and he hammered at me with such a wigour only to be equalled by the wigour with which he didnt hammer at his anwil. Youre a listening and understanding, Pip? He then reveals that Mrs Joe doesnt like scholarly people in her house And she aint over partial to having scholars on the premises Joe continued, and in partickler would not be over partial to my being a scholar, for fear as I might rise. Like a sort of rebel, dont you see? In this there is a clear sign that Joe doesnt want any disharmony in his house and he doesnt want to treat his wife like his dad treated his mum. So for this reason he puts up with Mrs Joe knocking his head for a little while against the wall behind him when he steps out of line. For this reason, it seems we must respect him as someone who learns not from his mistakes, but other peoples. There are times in the novel, where Joe seems to be acting really stupidly but is in fact being proud. The first time this crops up is when Joe and Pip go to Satis House to talk to Miss Havisham. Joe, to Pips embarrassment, refuses to talk to Pip as though Miss Havisham is not there Pip, returned Joe, cutting me short as if he was hurt, which I meantersay that were not a question requiring a answer betwixt yourself and me, and which you know the answer to be full well No. You know it to be No, Pip, and wherefore should I say it? Miss Havisham has just asked Joe a question and it is strange that he addresses Pip instead. Pip after becoming a gentleman, is very snobbish and looks down on Joe. For this reason Joe tries to act very upper class and tries not to embarrass Pip in front of his friends. Since you are so kind as make chice of coffee, I will not run contrairy to your own opinions. He calls Pip Sir many times and at one point Pip says Joe, I interrupted, pettishly, how can you call me Sir? However even after this scene which Joe looks foolish, he actually regains his dignity; Joe looked at me for a single instant with something faintly like reproach. Utterly preposterous as his cravat was, and as his collars were, I was conscious of a sort of dignity in the look. Here we have two contrasting statements. Pip tells us that Joe looks extremely foolish in his cravat and collar but under the foolishness is someone who is extremely dignified. Not many people are like that especially when their son, has just rebuked them for addressing them wrongly. The next time Joes dignity really shines through is when he leaves Pip on page 222. He knows he looks stupid in the clothes because and says so Im wrong in these clothes. Im wrong out of the forge, the kitchen, or off th meshes Im awfully dull, but I hope Ive beat out something nigh the rights of this at last The terrible thing is, is that Joe knows Pip looks down on him and is ashamed of him. He says You wont find half so much fault in me if you think of me in my forge dress, with my hammer in my hand, or even my pipe. You wont find half as much fault in me if, supposing as you should ever wish to see me, you come and put your head in at the forge winder He knows Pip looks down on him and is embarrassed about him, he feels sorry for Pip and blames it on himself. This is a very honourable thing to do and definitely makes us show respect for him. We see other characters from different pieces of literature placed in similar situations and act very differently and with less patience. For example Eddie Carbone in A View for the Bridge. When Pip becomes ill, due to a number of things: severe burning, a run-in with Orlick and Provis becoming captured, Joe comes to visit him and looks after him. Joe doesnt want to fall into embarrassing Pip again. Due to Pips earlier disrespect towards Joe, Joe is less easy with Pip. But, imperceptibly, though I held them fast, Joes hold upon them began to slacken; and whereas, I wondered at this at first, I soon began to understand that the cause of it was in me, and that the fault of it was all mine. Joe has regained his dignity so instead of getting emotionally close to Pip, he draws himself away from him as soon as he senses he is getting stronger. Joe, earlier on is obviously trying to impress Pip by learning to write and Pip starts crying because he sees the pride with which Joe has written the letter to him. Pip is very lucky to have an uncle like Joe because Joe is an excellent person. On the surface he seems to be foolish but underneath he is a pure and righteous man. He always forgives Pip for whatever injustice Pip does to him. In the balance, the reasons we should respect Joe Gargery far outweigh the reasons why we should treat him like a foolish character and one that is not worthy of our respect.

Bounty Scandal Essay -- Case Review

When does a contact sport become a crime? That is the question that every National Football League (NFL) fan has asked themselves in light of the former Saints defensive coordinator (DC) Gregg Williams’ â€Å"bounty program.† No one person has wrestled with this question more than the NFL commissioner Rodger Goodell. Goodell was faced with an ethical decision that will shape his tenure as the NFL’s commissioner; his decision will become precedence for many commissioners after him. Using the RESOLVEDD strategy of decision-making developed by Raymond Pfeiffer and Ralph Forsberg (2005), this paper will examine the scandal, scrutinize the decisions made, and determine if the NLF commissioner took the correct action for the league. The first step of the RESOLVEDD process, represented by â€Å"R,† is â€Å"review the case† (Pfeiffer & Forsberg, 2005). The NFL began investigating the New Orleans Saints after their Super Bowl win in 2009, when accusations arose that the organization had organized a cash payout bonus program for injuring players. The extra payouts are against league rules, prohibiting non-contract bonuses. Additionally, these bonuses did not pay for performance; but, specifically cart-offs, concussions, and knock-outs. The sums of these payouts reached up to $50,000 during the 2009 playoffs. Early investigations died out when security personnel interviewed players and coaches; they all denied that such a program ever existed (National Football League, 2012). The league at that time could not prove the allegations, but Goodell wanted to ensure that the league understood this type of program would not be tolerated. The league would send out bi-annual letters to all teams, remind ing them that out-of-contract bonuses are illegal... ...imes.com/2012/03/22/sports/football/nfl-delivers-harsh-punishment-to-saints-over-bounty-program.html?pagewanted=all Cherry, E., Sealey, D., & Mangialardi, L. (1991). Understanding the risks. Journal of Sport Management, 5(2), 198. Kahn, L. (2009). Sports, antitrust enforcement and collective bargaining. Antitrust Bulletin, 54(4), 857-881. Retrieved April 24, 2012, from the EBSCO Host database. National Football League. (2012). Full NFL statement into 'bounty' program run by New Orleans Saints. nola.com. Retrieved May 1, 2012, from www.nola.com/saints/index.ssf/2012/03/full_nfl_statement_into_bounty.html O'Rourke, M. (2011). Risk on the field and in the headlines. Risk Management, 58(3), 37. Retrieved April 24, 2012, from the EBSCO Host database. Pfeiffer, R., & Forsberg, R. (2005). Ethics on the job: cases and strategies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.

Peter Green’s first day Essay

Get the order from Bob Franklin. In order to get the order, Peter has to face the problem of â€Å"freight cost†. Secondary contradiction for Peter Green: 1) His supervisor, John Murphy makes no bones about his scorn for the new breed of salespeople at Scott Carpet, such as Peter himself. 2) Tiff with John Murphy. How to deal with the principal contradiction for Peter Green As Peter Green has to face his ethical principle of no lies, he cannot bear from lying to the front office or he will encounter a faith breaking. That leaves only choice is to satisfy Bob Franklin in order to not lose the commission, at the same time, not breaking his ethical rules. There is one way to finish the task and benefit both sides. Peter could ask the company to bring forward a preferential strategy that all the firms that have a long-term partnership with Scott Carpets (Such as Peabody Rug) will be given a certain credit according to the size of the order. In that kind of strategy, Peter will not need to face the dilemma and Bob get what he wants. It’s a win-win situation, job done. Conspiracy? Let’s say it’s an overt one. Whatever happened in system, stayed in system, and solve in system. How to deal with the secondary contradiction for Peter Green First thing, be nice to John Murphy, whatever it’s from the bottom of the heart or act according to circumstance. Show some respect to the supervisors. Secondly, do everything nicely, keep follow the ethic rules but learn to be adaptable. Last but not least, play the overt one, not conspiracy. What if the company doesn’t agree with the new strategy? As to the character of John Murphy, it’s easy to tell his arrogance. By that case, Peter’s new idea may face a very dangerous situation. As the rule â€Å"Whatever happened in system, stayed in system, and solved in system†, Peter cannot bypass the immediate leader (John Murphy) to do the report. By that case, he has to endure hardships (agree with his BOSS John Murphy and show the loyalty to him) to wait the promotion comes. When he gets promoted to, let’s say, District Manager, he can change the rules and play his game.

Famous Literary Greats Who Had Mental Illness

Their works have inspired generations. Their words have been a solace for millions of souls. Their personalities have served as cannon fodder for literature enthusiasts and historians for ages. They continue to intrigue people because they make them laugh, cry and become emotionally invested with their contributions to literature. But what most people don’t know about these larger-than-life personalities is that they were flawed. Some of them had their personal demons, some of them endlessly wresting with the pitfalls of mental illness, all the while lending credence to the fact that creativity is linked to mental health. Let’s take a look at some of these literary greats with a history of mental illness. They may have achieved greatness with their works but they were still hostage to oftentimes the most debilitating mental illness issues. 1.  Sylvia Plath She’s famous for writing many great books, with morbidity and depressive episodes a recurring theme in her works. When she was in college, she fell into a depressive episode and had to be administered shock treatment therapy. Her hospitalization was a precursor to how bad her mental illness would get with the passage of time. During this time, she wrote her most famous work, The Bell Jar. And it’s easy to see how her own experience with mental illness factored into her magnum opus. Today, there’s a whole term named after her – The Sylvia Plath effect. The premise behind this term was that creative people are more prone and susceptible to fall into depressive tendencies. She made numerous suicide attempts and finally succeeded in 1963. Her doctor used to prescribe her medication for clinical depression. Sylvia Plath had her fair share of mood swings, impulsive tendencies and a hot-headed temper. Even the slightest hint of rejection would push her into an extreme bout of dejection and a heightened state of unwanted-ness. All these aspects figure heavily in her poems, lending her works an authentic flair of having experienced issues, like self-loathing, suicide and dysfunction firsthand. 2.  Leo Tolstoy Leo Tolstoy’s troubles with depression and mental illness began well into the middle age. He produced a literary work that detailed his discontentedness with the world at large in A Confession. His illness, when it reared its ugly head, was intense and not gradual. His rumination proved to be the driving force behind his themes about philosophy, art and life. By looking at his own distress, his literary works became a reflection of his overall mental state. Unlike Plath, he never contemplated suicide, because he thought he didn’t have the courage for it. He mocked himself as a moral failure due to this fact. Tolstoy, however, was lucky to escape his mental maladies. He eventually found God, became devout and gave up the notion of suicide once and for all. He died aged 82, leaving the literary world all the poorer for it. 3.  Virginia Woolf The celebrated writer was beset with depression from a young age, some studies putting her first brush with mental illness at 15. Where most writers celebrated their depression in their works, Virginia Woolf found her illness frequently interfered with her creative moments, hindering her works with intermittent mood swings, sleeplessness, migraines and hallucinations. Virginia Woolf ended her life in 1941, her fights with mental illness issues eventually getting their way with her. These are three famous literary greats who had a tryst with mental illness. There are several others, but that is a story for another day.